And that's ok, but do we really want them in a voting booth? Only if they get special ballots adding "both" and "none of the above" to the list of candidates.
Do they have jobs? How do they decide what to wear in the morning? Are they waiting to get dressed until one of their pairs of pants addresses an issue they really care about? Waiting for a shirt sleeve to deliver that knock out punch?
I know one thing--the bastards get a whole hell of a lot of attention for not deciding. Being politically ambivalent gives them a power they've never had in any other area of their lives.
Anyone who's undecided at this stage is plain-out passive-aggressive. But, hey, wouldn't you be undecided if you got to get on national TV shaking your head indecisively, pinching up your finicky face, saying stupid things like " Well, neither candidate has spelled out a plan for my third cousin's recurrent bladder infection yet ."
They keep waiting for Godot to turn up. They think neither candidate is presidential enough or that both are. They believe it's a good idea to nuke Iran, but maybe not. They think going to war with Russia could defeat terrorism, but wonder whether it could lead to a tax increase. They want the right to own guns but they can't decide what kind.
Meanwhile, they get a sly satisfaction from watching McCain pose as a peace-nik and Obama tell Pakistan to "bring it on".
Still, they can't decide if they want war or peace.
On November 4, let's hope these "decision challenged" cretins are hung up in a waffle house somewhere deciding between a waffle with chicken and a waffle without.